[cp-patches] gcj/classpath cosmetic configure improvement
aph at redhat.com
Mon Jan 31 09:50:51 UTC 2011
On 01/31/2011 05:32 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I noticed by accident that classpath's configure printed “no: command
> not found”. It turned out that “no” isn't a very good command to pass
> to AM_CONDITIONAL, because although it works, it's a bit noisy. I
> changed it to false, that should have the same effect, except that it
> won't be noisy on most systems.
> I'm checking this in at this point in the development cycle although it
> doesn't fix any open bug reports and I have no idea whether it's a
> regression just because it's such a trivial patch.
OK, but please also send to classpath. We don't want divergences.
More information about the Classpath-patches