0.93 branch created
aph at redhat.com
Sat Dec 2 11:08:18 UTC 2006
Mark Wielaard writes:
> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:47 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > Great news Mark! What's the plan for the generics branch? From this,
> > it sounds like we keep it around until the release itself, which seems
> > sensible (so we have a 0.93 generics release).
> Yes that is a good plan. And if everything goes right then that will be
> till Monday at the latest.
> > I guess after that it
> > gets synchronized with HEAD again, and then the updated branch becomes
> > HEAD (after creating a 1.4 branch). Does that sound about right?
> I don't believe you can 'switch' a branch to become the trunk with CVS.
> So after the resync with HEAD we need to actually merge the
> generics-branch changes onto the trunk (which should be "just" one big
> diff because they just got synced, but watch out for those added/removed
OK. I'd like to have a "semi-official" 0.93 generics release for gcj.
If we have that then gcj can go to Java 5 at the end of next week
(i.e. we'll merge gcj-eclipse branch to trunk.)
More information about the Classpath