0.93 branch created

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Sat Dec 2 11:08:18 UTC 2006

Mark Wielaard writes:

 > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:47 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
 > > Great news Mark!  What's the plan for the generics branch?  From this,
 > > it sounds like we keep it around until the release itself, which seems
 > > sensible (so we have a 0.93 generics release).
 > Yes that is a good plan. And if everything goes right then that will be
 > till Monday at the latest.
 > >   I guess after that it
 > > gets synchronized with HEAD again, and then the updated branch becomes
 > > HEAD (after creating a 1.4 branch).  Does that sound about right?
 > I don't believe you can 'switch' a branch to become the trunk with CVS.
 > So after the resync with HEAD we need to actually merge the
 > generics-branch changes onto the trunk (which should be "just" one big
 > diff because they just got synced, but watch out for those added/removed
 > files).

OK.  I'd like to have a "semi-official" 0.93 generics release for gcj.
If we have that then gcj can go to Java 5 at the end of next week
(i.e. we'll merge gcj-eclipse branch to trunk.)


More information about the Classpath mailing list